american way weed and feed reviews

Are Weed & Feed Lawn Care Products Too Toxic to Use?

Combination Fertilizer/ Herbicide Products Banned in Canada

  • Pin
  • Share
  • Email

Companies specializing in chemical lawn-care products have long offered combination products that contain both fertilizers to feed the lawn and herbicides to kill crabgrass or broadleaf weeds. There are often marketed as time-saving products that allow a homeowner to accomplish both feeding and weed control in one action. Examples of these products include a variety of Scotts’ Weed & Feed Turfbuilder formulations, BioAdvanced’s Weed & Feed Fertilizer and Crabgrass Killer, Greenview’s Weed & Feed, Preen’s Weed Preventer and Plant Food, and Knox Weed/Feed.

What Is “Weed and Feed”?

Weed and Feed is a combination of fertilizer and broadleaf herbicide that is usually applied to lawn mid-season as a way to knock down weeds and feed the grass in one easy application. The fertilizer ratio can vary, but most popular brands usually feature a high nitrogen water-soluble fertilizer that encourages top growth. The vast majority of these products are in a granular form that is applied over the lawn with a broadcast spreader or drop spreader.

Limitations and Problems

Independent lawn experts see problems with weed and feed products on several fronts. First, the high nitrogen content stimulates top growth, but it does nothing to the overall health and vigor of the grass plants. All lawn fertilizers are somewhat nitrogen-heavy since deep green foliage is the goal, but a better fertilizer choice is one that is somewhat more balanced, offering at least some phosphorus to help the grass plants store and use nutrients, and some potassium to assist with root development.

The typical application time for weed and feed products, generally mid-summer is also not necessarily the best time to jolt your lawn with heavy feeding. Spring and early summer are much better times for major fertilizer application to a lawn.

The excess nitrogen found in weed and feed products can indeed leave you with an enviable, dark green lawn, but that grass will be extremely susceptible to drought. And excess nitrogen can lead to grub infestations and disease conditions.

But it is with the weed-control aspect of weed and feed products that the real trouble starts. The herbicide used is a powdered form of popular broadleaf herbicides that contain 2,4-D, mecoprop, and dicamba. This combination of chemicals is popular because it performs a lethal action on broadleaf weeds while leaving lawn grass unharmed. These products work by sticking onto the surface of the weeds, so conditions must be exactly right for the product to work. The lawn should be wet to allow the herbicide dust to stick to the leaves, but it is also important that rain is not forecasted; you don’t want to wash the product off the leaf before it has done its job. These precise optimal conditions can make proper application of weed and feed quite difficult, which often leads to misuse.

Banned in Canada

Combination products containing fertilizer and herbicide have been officially banned in Canada since 2010. Many provinces already had some legislation restricting the use of weed and feed or cosmetic herbicides, but the decision by Health Canada brought a total ban on the sale and use of the once-popular combination product.

The legislation concerning using weed and feed in Canada side-steps the most controversial aspects of using chemical herbicides—mainly the health concerns of long-term, repeated exposures—and goes for a more agronomic approach. Instead of entering the health controversy, the Canadian decision focused on the inefficiency of these products.

First, applying herbicide as a blanket application is not necessary. Weed and feed products spread herbicide to the far reaches of the lawn, whether there are weeds or not. Practices like this are out of touch with integrated pest management (IPM) and other, more sensible approaches to lawn care. Using herbicide where none is needed is excessive and not environmentally sound.

Another problem with combining the two products is that fertilizing the lawn and killing weeds on the lawn are best viewed as two separate events that should not be combined. Fertilizing the lawn should be done following your chosen lawn care regimen while eliminating weeds is its own practice and can be done more safely and more efficiently by spot spraying throughout the season.


Homeowners should consider the very real health risks that come with using any chemical herbicides, especially for children, pets, pregnant women, and the elderly.

Philip Landrigan, dean for global health and a professor of pediatrics at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, observes that because children grow quickly,

. they take into their bodies more of the pesticides that are in the food, water and air.

[Their] delicate developmental processes are easily disrupted by very small doses of toxic chemicals that would be virtually harmless for an adult.

Alternative Forms of Weed Control

If you must use chemical herbicides on a lawn, a far more responsible approach is to spot-treat weeds. Use a liquid spray product to coat the leaves of individual weeds when you spot them—doing this immediately after lawn-mowing chores is a good regimen.

And don’t discount the old-fashioned means of weed control—digging them out by hand. Especially in a small lawn, hand-removal of weeds is not a difficult chore, especially if you do it routinely so that major weed infestations cannot take root. A variety of helpful tools are available for lawn weed removal, ranging from long-handled forks to weed “poppers” that can remove the entire root. Weeding by hand also has the benefit of naturally aerating your lawn as you remove cores containing weed roots.

In some areas, any cosmetic use of herbicides—not just weed and feed—has been outlawed, and even spot-spraying weeds is not a viable alternative. A simple IPM program can help, along with a proper lawn care regimen. In any case, a strong argument could be made for looking into organic lawn care. Organic weed control takes a more holistic approach to weeds and sees their presence as a sign of other underlying problems. Many weeds invade when the grass is stressed or thin/bare turf is present. An aggressive over-seeding program can help, as well as mowing the lawn at heights of three inches or more. Some weeds—dandelions for example—tend to favor soils low in calcium, so a soil test and subsequent calcium applications may be a way to reduce their numbers. Ultimately, providing the optimum conditions for growing grass is the best way to control weeds.

Weed & feed products containing fertilizer and herbicide have environmental concerns that should be considered before you use them.

Weed & Feed: Scotts brand or Store Brand?

I am about to put weed and feed on my lawn in next 2 days.

for 40LB bag, Scotts weed and feed is $50, And 50LB bag of store brand(Menards) weed& feed is $26.

Is it worth going with Scotts? Numbers on both the products are same ’39-0-0′

Comments (2)


I’d suggest that you use neither. A better approach is to do two separate applications. First fertilize. Then, about two weeks later, when the weeds are growing like crazy, use a weed killer. Unless your lawn is mostly weeds, I would get a broadleaf weed killer and spot spray only where the weeds are. But don’t spray if daily highs will be above 90 (maybe 80, check the label).

The reason for doing it in two steps is that the weed killers are absorbed through the leaves and work best when the weeds are growing vigorously.

As for the brand, I don’t think it matters. You’re looking to apply a specific amount of N,P,K and those are the numbers on the bag. It doesn’t make a lot of difference who made it, it’s what’s inside.

  • Like
  • Save

I’ve used Scott’s, Lowe’s Sta-Green and HD’s Vigoro. I’ve found that in my climate, Scott’s (granular) acts more quickly, but Sta-Green (which is pelletized) feeds more evenly and lasts longer. The problem is that the only Sta-Green products (made by Spectracide) I can get are Phosphorus-free which has a noticeably poorer result in spring feeding. As a result, I tend to use equal parts Scott’s (with Phos) and Sta-Green (without Phos). Best of both worlds, I suppose. I agree with BPGREEN that nothing beats spot treatment with a liquid broadleaf weed killer. It’s also nice to know that you’re not spreading weed killer where it isn’t needed. If you have a lot of weeds, definitely get a backpack sprayer and use a mix from concentrate. It’s been a great investment for me on my 3 acre parcel. you can get 3 or 4 gallon backpacks for under $100. It saves time and your back.

  • Like
  • Save

Related Discussions

LED recessed lighting in long/narrow lv room, showcase fireplace, and large “foyer” L shaped

Bi-fold closet doors need replacing

POLL: How do you control weeds in your yard?

Crabgrass taking over! Rodents galore! Black thumb disease!

I am about to put weed and feed on my lawn in next 2 days. for 40LB bag, Scotts weed and feed is $50, And 50LB bag of store brand(Menards) weed& feed is $26. Is it worth going with Scotts? Numbers on both the products are same '39-0-0'